Let's try to do some reasoning on a ʇsıʍʇ in time. Back in the BC's we know of people such as Noah who lived for about 900 years and also Abraham who lived for a couple of crazy years too I think. Then there was a stipulation that one day, this world would come to an end. This stipulation was made relative to the time and the ticking clocks of the BC's.
It is now scientifically proven that, a human cell cannot last for more than 200 years, despite the number of mitotic and meotic operations it perfroms. This means that a human being can't leave as long as in the BC's. This brings about the question of the time scalling. Does it mean we use a different time scalling from those in the BCs or what causes us not to leave as long as those in the BCs did. Carrying out some archaeological studies, I found out that the difference actually comes with the time scaling . What we consider a month today was actually a year in the BCs and the difference between a month today and a year in the BCs is about 4days, 22minutes and 17.23 seconds.
So to this effect does it mean the world would end earlier than was stipulated?No. What has happened is just a matter of altering the count and not changing the events. Hence after intense calculations with very few but dangerous assumptions. I found out that the world has to end on a February 30th but our ancestors adjusted our time scalings and made sure that this date never appears in any "calendar". What they did was just "the principle of conservation of the truth", for it still holds that on a February 30th, all will come to an end. The question I am trying to answer now it on what year, relative to the current time scalling.
It is now scientifically proven that, a human cell cannot last for more than 200 years, despite the number of mitotic and meotic operations it perfroms. This means that a human being can't leave as long as in the BC's. This brings about the question of the time scalling. Does it mean we use a different time scalling from those in the BCs or what causes us not to leave as long as those in the BCs did. Carrying out some archaeological studies, I found out that the difference actually comes with the time scaling . What we consider a month today was actually a year in the BCs and the difference between a month today and a year in the BCs is about 4days, 22minutes and 17.23 seconds.
So to this effect does it mean the world would end earlier than was stipulated?No. What has happened is just a matter of altering the count and not changing the events. Hence after intense calculations with very few but dangerous assumptions. I found out that the world has to end on a February 30th but our ancestors adjusted our time scalings and made sure that this date never appears in any "calendar". What they did was just "the principle of conservation of the truth", for it still holds that on a February 30th, all will come to an end. The question I am trying to answer now it on what year, relative to the current time scalling.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire